
Golden Jubilee House or Flagstaff House? None Sacrosanct
Names have significance! Invariably, nothing is named without basis. Particularly in the African setting, names are assigned to people and things for various reasons, which could stretch to religious or historical motivations.
Indeed, names are chosen to reflect the importance and purpose of their referents. The pains taken to select a name for any society’s monument is usually directly proportional to its significance in the life of the people. It takes into consideration the shared values and lived experiences of the people as well as their common aspirations.
To this extent, the propriety of the name given to Ghana’s presidential palace must certainly be based on cultural and historical considerations. In this regard, the collective manifestations of the Ghanaian peoples’ arts and other human intellectual achievements should be reflected in the name of the abode of the president. Thus, the most encompassing and nationalistic name for the Presidential palace is proposed here.
At Independence in 1957, Ghana built an architectural monument to house the president of the new independent nation. This edifice was upgraded in 2007 when the nation turned 50 as a sign that the nation had come far after independence.
However, the construction of the edifice the second time has generated a lot of public debate.
The debate has centred on the very justification for putting up such an edifice at its cost for the president at a time when many Ghanaians found it difficult to put food on their tables. Then the debate shifted to the name of the presidential palace.
The then New Patriotic Party (NPP) government had proposed to rename the re-built palace as the Golden Jubilee House. It was to commemorate the 50th Anniversary of the nation’s independence from colonialism at the hands of the British.
The opposition lead by the national Democratic Congress (NDC) took strong exception to the renaming of the Flagstaff House, adducing various reasons.
Reading or listening beyond the reasons given, it was obvious that people were arguing purely on the basis of political expediency rather than objectivity. While it was not difficult to predict that members of the NDC could oppose the new name, one could also expect the NPP members to defend it.
When President Mills of the NDC took over power in 2009, it was not clear if he was going to use the Jubilee House, as he had expressed sharp opposition to the construction of the palace. This uncertainty still hangs in the air.
Now the original name of the place has been inscribed on the outer walls of the presidential palace. Already, this inscription has revived the debate over which name is appropriate for the Ghana’s presidential palace.
Three years after the debate began, the protagonists and antagonists are still arguing on political lines; one cannot tell who is acting with the interest of the nation at heart or, at least, on their lips or at the tip of their pens.
With the Government’s current concentration on projecting Nkrumah, his values and his accomplishments as well as the inscription of Flagstaff House on the walls of the palace, it is obvious that the name is being reversed to Flagstaff House.
Ghanaians are yet to know what informed this decision; who made it and how it was made. It must be noted that the process for making this decision is as important as the decision itself.
The solution proposed here is not meant to be the mid-point or a compromise stance. Satisfying people of all political persuasions is not the purpose, far from that! It has not been triggered by any debate.
Ghana’s presidential palace is best called GOLDEN JUBILEE FLAGSTAFF HOUSE.
Among other things, this name maintains the known identity of the president’s abode at Independence, while indicating that it was re-built to signify the progress made 50 years after Ghana regained her independence from the stagnating shackles of colonialism.